RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00917
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, Item 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to
Released from Required Active Duty.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His reserve unit was activated during the Gulf War. He engaged
on active missions in the gulf and was not on training orders.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 18 Aug
77.
The applicants master personnel records reflect a DD Form 214,
was issued for the period 22 Apr 91 and 10 Sep 91. The
narrative reason for separation reflects Released from Required
Active Duty Training. For this period, he was credited with 4
months and 19 days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. They conducted a review of the
applicants records and found no documents that identify the
member participated on active duty from 22 Apr 91 to 10 Sep 91
in support of the Gulf War on any contingency or deployment.
They included a Point Credit History computer generated rip
which shows the applicant was on active duty for a school tour.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant contends that due to the escalation of the Gulf
War and the need for aircrew members, he was recalled to active
duty for the timeframe 22 Apr 91 through 10 Sep 91. The
applicant believes the fact he received a DD Form 214 proves
this point.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, to include his
rebuttal comments, in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-00917 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 22 Apr 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.
Exhibit E. Applicants Letter, dated 5 Nov 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect she served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD from Jan 91 to Apr 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00315
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, does not reflect his AFOR and his AFAM. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of the applicants requests that his record be corrected to reflect two overseas tours of active duty covering the periods of 20 Sep 1988 to 12 Feb 1990 and 15 Oct 1990 to 14 Mar 1991 and that he be entitled to the AFOR. Moreover, on 20 Mar 2013, the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03159
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of award of the AFEM and JMUA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The JMUA is only awarded to those members of the Armed Forces of the United States who were present at the time and directly participated in the service or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, with a period of service ending 30 Sep 05, be corrected to include active duty time served from 21 Sep 90 to 3 Jul 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02419
The applicants DD Form 214 reflects award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Air Force Good Conduct Medal - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award - Air Force Longevity Service Award with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Air Force Training Ribbon The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03024
The applicant provided a copy of the certificate awarding him the MSM first OLC for his outstanding service for the period 15 Feb 10 through 27 Feb 14. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Vermont Commendation Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01466
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01466 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be added to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 27 Jul 03, the applicant was demobilized (released from active duty) and reverted to her traditional (part-time) status as a member of the Air Force Reserve. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02257
In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Retired or separated personnel are not eligible to apply for correction through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); therefore, they must apply to the AFBCMR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there...